Law Blog

Bedsores Part II: Maine Families Can Take Action

March 3rd, 2009

A Bedsore is A Wound

You visit your parent and overhear a nurse’s aide tell your mother/father that “the nurse will come in after your visitor leaves and change your dressing.” What dressing!!!

This may be your first inkling that anything has gone wrong with you parent or grandparent. You ask questions and learn the truth—your family member has been allowed to develop a bedsore!

No one who comes to a Maine nursing home should develop a bedsore. Developing a bedsore in a Maine nursing home is supposed to be a “never event”. It doesn’t matter whether you live in Augusta or Aroostook, Bangor, Portland or Rockland. A bedsore wound should happen so rarely that the federal government has instructed Medicare and Medicaid not to pay for bedsore treatment. Maine Nursing homes are required to follow these federal laws just like every other state.

If your parent or grandparent develops a bedsore while a nursing home resident, send a fax to the nursing home and your loved one’s doctor along these lines:

Dear “X” Nursing Home Administrator and Dr. “Y”:

When my parent came to you he (she) did not have a bedsore. I made a special point to ask that you take care that my parent not develop a bedsore. Under Federal Law (42 CFR Sec. 483.25 you were supposed to make sure that my parent (grandparent) did not develop a pressure sore. Please explain to me in writing why this happened. Also, please write to me and tell me what you are going to do to provide necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevalent infections and prevent new sores from developing.

Thank you for giving this matter your attention.

Very truly yours,

Make sure you save the fax transmission record and then call for an appointment with the nursing home director and the doctor to discuss what they plan to do. When you meet, emphasize that you want them to write back to you, and that a conversation won’t cut the mustard. Tell the doctor that you want him to personally inspect the wound. Tell the doctor that you want a written report that tells you:

  • The size of the wound
  • The stage of the wound
  • The treatment he intends to use to heal the wound
  • How he intends to hold the nurses responsible for following his orders.
  • When he intends to inspect the wound next.
  • What pain medication he is going to give to your loved one.

These actions, writing and having a meeting, are important steps you can take to make sure that your loved one doesn’t linger, or even die, from a bedsore wound.

Tomorrow:

Step Three: What To Do Make Up For What Can’t Be Fixed About a Bedsore

Bedsores: Maine Families Can Help

March 2nd, 2009

A Bedsore Is A Wound

Imagine having someone gouge a hole out of your body at the base of your spine. Down through the skin, down through the light cushion of tissue under the skin, down past muscle, right down to the bone. Raw exposed nerves fire over and over, screaming their pain message into your entire being. This wound is deep, and wide, and it constantly weeps nutrients out the hole. You can’t turn yourself, you are lying on this hole in the body, and the pain is excruciating. You get weaker every day. Strong pain medication dulls the pain, but it never goes away, and every time the medication wears off you are gripped by the pain again.

There is no need for someone to suffer this fate.

When nursing home staff allow a patient to develop this wound it feels the same to the patient as if they had a deliberately inflicted wound.

Step One: Speak Up, And Leave A Record

What can we do to help our loved one’s nursing home and physician get it right? What can we do to prevent our parents and grandparents from suffering like this?

Let’s start with knowing what this problem is.

Bedsores, Pressure Sores, Ulceration, Skin Wound. These are all words that are used to mean the same thing.

When your parent or grandparent goes into a nursing home consider doing the following:

Make sure there is a record that your loved one doesn’t have a bedsore. (If your loved has a bedsore, make sure there is a record of where it is, how wide it is, what it looks like, how long it has been present, and what is being done to treat it.)

What do I mean about making a record? I don’t mean telling the nice people who take down all the information about you parent or grandparent at the time of admission that you are concerned about the issue. Certainly, do that. However, I mean something different. I mean finding out the fax number of the nursing home and your parent’s doctor and faxing both of them a note along these lines:

Dear “X”,

My (mother/father/grandparent) is being admitted to your facility today. This is to let you know that my (mother/father/grandparent) does not have any decubitus ulcer/pressure sore at this time. Please take every measure to maintain the good condition/integrity of my (parent/grandparent)’s skin, including careful checking and documentation. If my (parent/grandparent) should develop a pressure ulcer please notify me in writing of that fact, including the location, size, stage and steps you are taking to care for the wound, including repositioning, wound care and nutrition. Please make this note a permanent part of my (mother/father/grandparent)’s chart. Thank you.

Then, fax that letter and save the facsimile transmission record.

This first step protects your family member by letting nursing home health care providers know that you are interested in being informed and that you expect them to be accountable for preventing this problem.

Tomorrow– Step Two: Take Action, And Ask The Doctor To Help

Copyright 2009 Briggs & Counsel

Hiding Abuse of Maine Nursing Home Residents

February 26th, 2009

You feel terrible.  You feel beyond terrible. You just found out that your parent or grandparent has been neglected, injured, abused, killed in a Maine nursing home.  It happens.  You can take action, right?  Not so fast.  The outgoing adminstration of George Bush quietly inserted language into federal law that pretends that all those nice Maine people who regulate Maine nursing homes are (even though they are not) federal employees who can’t be forced to tell the truth about what they find out about Maine nursing home safety.  Keith Olbermann blasted the law at the end of a recent MSN “Countdown”  piece.   Think it’s outrageous to silence Maine nursing regulators?  So do we. But it isn’t going to stop Briggs & Counsel from prosecuting cases of nursing home negligence.    If your loved one was injured or died from negligent care at a Maine nursing home, call an attorney who specializes in nursing home litigation.  And write to your U.S. Senator (Olympia Snowe or Susan Collins)  to allow State of Maine employees to tell the truth about what they find at Maine nursing homes.

Copyright 2009 Briggs & Counsel

Alison Wholey Mynick, RN, Esq.

Reusing plastic syringes: a threat to the health of Maine patients?

February 22nd, 2009

Infection control advocates and patients who have contracted hepatitis from contaminated plastic syringes and medicine vials have joined forces in a campaign to warn Maine residents and Americans nationwide about the risks involved in reusing such medical items.

In a recent federal study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, it was found that over 60,000 people have been exposed to hepatitis, with at least 400 having been infected by it.

Hepatitis is defined as a viral infection of the liver. The most common form, hepatitis C, afflicts more than three million Americans and is potentially life threatening. It can cause permanent liver damage and may cause no initial symptoms, with the potential of remaining undetected for years.

Hygiene lapses, such as improper handwashing, have received more attention but according to Joe Perz of the CDC, reusing syringes “is something that is obviously wrong”.

“It really represents a breakdown in very basic patient safety. There really is a sense of outrage among many providers and others working in this area when they hear about some of these outbreaks and some of the practices,” Perz said. He blamed the problem on ignorance and lack of oversight.

At times, doctors or nurses injected several patients from single-use medicine vials - to “cut corners,” Perz said, or, some authorities believe, to save money, according to the CDC.

Advocates and the CDC are trying to raise awareness about the problem. The coalition includes infection control specialists and nurse anesthetists.

The campaign is designed to alert doctors, nurses and other medical workers that syringes must only be used once. Patients should be watching for safety precautions and speaking up if they see or suspect a violation.

Copyright 2009 Briggs & Counsel, by Eliza Stoll

Prevent Maine Infants and Toddlers from Drowning

February 12th, 2009

Sometimes a picture, or in this case a video, truly is worth a thousand words. With our abundance of lakes and ponds,  as well as our access to the ocean, every Maine parent should think about this:

Alison Wholey Mynick, RN, Esq.
Briggs & Counsel
815 Commercial Street
Rockport ME 04856
207.596.1099
297.596.7401 fax
amynick@dbriggslaw.com
www.maine-personal-injury-lawyers.com

Salmonella Outbreaks: Mainers at risk for Peanut Butter Poisoning?

February 3rd, 2009

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been receiving reports, from many states, including Maine, of illnesses caused by a type of Salmonella called Salmonella Typhimurium. Several deaths may also be associated with this outbreak.

After much laboratory testing and analysis, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and CDC confirmed that the sources of the outbreak were peanut butter and peanut paste produced by the Peanut Corporation of America (PCA) at its Blakely, Georgia, processing plant.

Peanut paste is a concentrated product consisting of ground, roasted peanuts that are distributed to food manufacturers to be used as an ingredient in many commercially produced products including cakes, cookies, crackers, candies, cereal and ice cream.

As a result of this finding, a number of foods containing peanut butter and peanut paste produced by PCA from July 1, 2008 until now were recalled on January 13, 2009. On January 28, 2009, PCA expanded its recall to include all peanut products produced on or after January 1, 2007.

Some of the recalls involve foods sold directly to consumers, such as peanut butter crackers, peanut butter cookies, and ice cream made with peanut butter, and others involve foods sold directly to institutions, restaurants, the food service industry, and private label food companies.

Copyright 2009 Briggs & Counsel by Elizabeth Stoll

Rating Maine Nursing Homes: Is Your Elderly Loved One Safe?

January 29th, 2009

Imagine living in a Maine nursing home and having cancer or arthritis so severe that you cannot get out of bed by yourself. You rely on the nurses to make sure your pain patch is in place, but the nurses don’t check, and the nursing assistants steal your pain medication. Imagine that no one comes right away when you press your call light to go the bathroom, and no one comes to help you change your position. Imagine that you fall out of bed and break your arm trying to get to the bathroom on your own. And imagine that, because you aren’t positioned by nurses on schedule, you develop a large and excruciatingly painful bedsore that grows deep into your flesh and becomes infected.

All of these images are real examples of injuries caused by nursing home negligence in Maine. Nursing home negligence caused by understaffing, or poorly trained staff, may cause severe injuries and death to Maine’s most vulnerable population- the nursing home bound elderly.

Families need to know that that their elderly mother, father, aunt, uncle or dear, older friend is safe and well cared for. How do Mainers scratch the surface of a nursing home that appears clean and pleasant on an introductory tour? One starting point is to look at a nursing home’s “star rating”.

The federal government has a five-star rating system. A Maine nursing home can obtain up to five stars (much above average) in each of five areas: Health Inspections, Nursing Home Staffing, Quality Measures, Fire/Safety. The lowest ranking possible is one star (much below average).

In Maine, the good news is that 26% of our long term care facilities received the government’s best nursing home score. However, more than 7% of our nursing homes received the lowest “one star” ranking.

According to officials, the five star rating system is meant to be an accompanying tool for consumers to compare nursing homes, but should not take the place of visits and interviews at the actual facility. Here’s why:

A Nursing Home may receive five stars for staffing, three stars for inspections, three stars for fire safety, but only one star for quality measures, and still have an overall score of three stars. Even if a nursing home has an overall three star score, would you want your mother or father exposed to a higher risk of injury, including bedsores and urinary tract infections, than they would encounter at a different nursing home only a half mile away? When a nursing home tells the federal government that it has great staffing, but also has a high percentage of bedsores, urinary tract infections and depressed residents, the facts speak for themselves. Nursing homes are only as good as the care they deliver.

Mainers may see the rating system as a way to challenge nursing homes to improve the care they provide in the 112 facilities across the state. Maine families considering nursing homes for loved ones should weigh many factors when choosing a long term care facility. The number of stars a nursing home is assigned is just the tip of the iceberg.

Copyright 2009 Briggs & Counsel

Are Mainers Affected by Dishonesty at the FDA?

January 29th, 2009

Honesty is the basis of good science. Government agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) count on good, honest science used by the government to protect the public.

In a recent letter to President-Elect Obama, several FDA scientists allege that dishonesty is prevalent at the agency and that the “scientific review process for medical devices has been corrupted and distorted by current FDA managers, thereby placing the American people at risk.”

Among the charges: scientists and doctors have been threatened and told, on occasion, to ignore FDA regulations; devices have not been properly labeled; managers without appropriate experience have been given authority to make final decisions about device regulation and have done so while ignoring serious safety and effectiveness concerns; FDA experts have been excluded from product meetings because manufacturers felt that they were “biased”; and manufacturers have been allowed to market their products without FDA approval.

An internal investigation of the charges, according to the scientists, has resulted in absolutely nothing. “No one was held accountable, no appropriate or effective actions have been taken, and the same managers who engaged in the wrongdoing remain in place and have been rewarded and promoted.”

With the transition to President-Elect Obama’s administration will come changes to the leadership of both the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

According to a recent statement from the FDA, “We have been working very closely with members of the transition team and any concerns or questions they have on any issue, we will address directly with the team. Separately, the agency is actively engaged in a process to explore the staff members’ concerns and take appropriate action.”

By: Eliza Stoll for Briggs & Counsel

Copyright 2009 Briggs&Counsel

Antipsychotic drugs and sudden cardiac death in Maine patients

January 20th, 2009

Maine residents who have been prescribed antipsychotic medications by their psychiatrist or physician should be aware that there is a low to moderate risk of sudden cardiac death when taking such medications.

According to a recent study among patients taking high doses of antipsychotics, there are about 3.3 cases per 1,000 that result in sudden cardiac death. Patients who have been prescribed antipsychotics need to be fully aware of all potential side effects before beginning a medication regime. Doctors need to fully disclose all potential risks to patients.

New research published recently in the New England Journal of Medicine shows that antipsychotic drugs are not risk free, the authors of the study urging more caution in fact in their use. The drugs are associated with a risk of sudden cardiac death, especially at higher doses.

Doctors prescribe antipsychotic medications for a variety of reasons these days, although they were originally intended to treat schizophrenia. They are now being used to treat anything from conduct disorder in children to aggressive behaviors in Alzheimer’s patients. Three particular antipsychotics; olanzepine, risperidone, and quetiapine; are in fact among the top ten drugs sold worldwide.

Antipsychotics are broken down into two categories: typical and atypical. The typical antipsychotics are older medications that have been used for many years to treat schizophrenia. The risk of sudden cardiac death with the use of typical antipsychotics is about 1.99 times greater than in patients who are not using antipsychotic medications. Atypical antipsychotics are newer medications used to treat a variety of behavioral and mental health problems and are considered to have a lesser risk of side effects than typical antipsychotics. According to the article, the risk of sudden cardiac death in patients taking atypical antipsychotics is 2.26 times greater than in patients who are not using antipsychotic medications.

Maine Medicine: The Dirty Secret of “Don’t Warn, Don’t Treat”

January 19th, 2009

Well, it’s official.  Here in Maine it is perfectly alright for a doctor to hide the fact that you have a possibly cancerous tumor from you.  He can violate his duty to disclose the existence of a “dark spot” on an x-ray  until the cancer has progressed to a point when the treatment is horrific, or even to the point where no amount of treatment will work and you face certain death. 

In a recent Maine Supreme Court case  the Court referred to Maine’s Health Security Act that sets the statute of limitations for suing a doctor or hospital at three years.  In  Dickey v. Vermette, Mrs. Maetta Dickey was a regular dental patient of  Dr. Vermette.  In March 2000 she had an x-ray that showed a “dark spot” .  Her dentists didn’t tell Mrs. Dickey about the dark spot, or ask her if she wanted any follow-up.  Instead, they kept the information to themselves, and decided that they would just “keep an eye on it.”  The dentists kept an eye on it for FIVE YEARS.  Then the dentist referred Mrs. Dickey to an oral surgeon who diagnosed the oral cancer.  But, because the cancer had progressed so far, a big piece of Mrs. Dickey’s face had to be cut out to make sure the tumor was removed. 

Not every Justice on Maine’s high court thinks that “Don’t Warn, Don’t Treat” is legal in Maine.  Justice Alexander thinks that the Court’s opinion is “contrary to good law, good medicine, and good common sense.”  Justice Alexander points to the fact that Mrs. Dickey had a special, confidential, doctor/patient relationship with her dentist.  Justice Alexander stated the plain fact that, in medicine, “when a suspicious dark spot appears on an x-ray, and cannot be otherwise explained, there should be disclosure and warning to the patient, further investigation, and forensic testing for the possibility of cancer.” And while one Maine law says that medical malpractice cases must be filed within three years of the negligent act, another Maine law says that the three years is “tolled” where a plaintiff has failed to learn of a negligent act as a result of defendant’s fraud.  And “fraud” doesn’t just mean hiding an important fact on purpose, or lying.  Fraud in Maine also means not telling someone you have a “special relationship” with information that there is a duty to disclose.  Like a doctor’s duty to disclose that you might have cancer. 

Justice Silver also thought Mrs. Dickey should have been able to base her claim on facts that related back to the 2000 failure to tell about the dark spot. 

But Justice Alexander and Justice Silver are in the minority.  All of Maine’s other Justices say their hands are tied by the law that says doctors are only responsible for their mistakes going three years back.  

So, if your doctor finds a possibly cancerous tumor on your x-ray, and waits until three years and one day to let you know about it, you cannot do anything about it.  Even if you have huge medical bills that were caused by the three year delay, even if you are going to die and leave your family without a bread-winner, even if the three year delay ruins everything you built your life on, too bad for you. 

Maine-TheWay Life Should Be…

For Doctors Who Sit On Critical Patient Information For Three Years!!!

Copyright 2009 Briggs & Counsel

Contact Us Today

Briggs and Counsel
815 Commercial Street
Rockport, ME 04856-4243
Tel: (207) 596-1099
Fax. (207) 596-7401
Toll Free: (888) 596-1099


Search the Blog